To sanction or not to sanction

// July 13th, 2008 // Politics, Project Mayhem

Jeremy Thurgood recently stated a question regarding the sanctions against Zimbabwe:

Have a look at the following BBC news article:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7503135.stm

Now consider this. South Africa had sanctions imposed (and rightly so) because a legally elected government was oppressing part of its population. Zimbabwe doesn’t have sanctions imposed because an illegal government is oppressing all of its population?

This whole thing makes me sick and is a reminder of why I should stay as far from politics as I possibly can.

I tentatively think that not apposing sanctions against Zimbabwe was the right thing to do. Saying it tentatively may appear a bit cowardly, but I can’t really say that I have enough insight into the situation to make a clear decision, for example, I can’t really find information on exactly which kind of sanctions have been proposed. What leads me to this view is, in South Africa, in the Apartheid era, it was a minority that oppressed a very large group of people. Even though the government at the time was legally voted, according to our laws at the time, it doesn’t meant that it was moral. I don’t think the issue of whether the government was legally elected or not is really the issue here. I think the issue here is that the people in Zimbabwe have no real freedom, they are suffering under a cruel dictatorship.

I think the real issue here is who it would hurt if sanctions would be ruled against the country. First of all, who would it hurt most if sanctions would be placed? I think it will put the people of Zimbabwe in a horrible situation. They may lose access to medical equipment and services, food, educational content and more. I doubt that the Zimbabwean government cares much if their people will be deprived of day-to-day necessaties (judging by their activities in recent years), so sanctions would just be a terrible idea in my opinion. In the South African context, the sanctions mostly hurt the elite and rich oppressors. It sent a strong international message, I agree that it was indeed necessary at the time. I don’t think it’s the wisest thing for Zimbabwe right now though. I respect the opinions of people who feel otherwise, but if it was my vote, I would also vote against the sanctions.

SociBook del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon

4 Responses to “To sanction or not to sanction”

  1. The US are the only people who haven’t gotten over sanctions. They are a kak way of sorting our kak leaders. People are realising that, so for e.g. Gordon Brown has proposed a travel ban and asset freeze on leaders. If the whole world does this, then it can make the lives of the leaders a mite more uncomfortable. The best would be a summons to see them at the Hauge, that would make travel a little harder too :)

  2. I don’t think sanctions of any kind could make things worse for the populace of Zimbabwe than they already are. To quote the article I linked to:

    “The proposed measures had included an arms embargo and a travel ban for President Robert Mugabe and 13 of his key allies.”

    Prohibiting arms imports will not hurt the general population. A travel ban for Bob and his cronies will not hurt the general population. An embargo on food imports would hurt the general population, but I don’t think anyone it proposing that.

    What really upsets me, when I sit and think about it, is the number of leaders (especially our own) who apparently don’t see anything wrong with what Mugabe is doing. Sure, Mbeki talks about “ongoing dialogue” and “quiet diplomacy” but as far as I can tell, it’s just an excuse to do nothing.

  3. Wizzy says:

    The book has to be thrown at Mugabe. Everything possible must be done. He has weathered so many storms – all pressure must be applied. The sooner the better.

    Sanctions are needed.

  4. jonathan says:

    If the sanctions are only against the leaders of the country, then I would support it too. The article did say that the sanctions would include the travel bans against Mugabe, but it didn’t state the complete list of sanctions (or where to find it). An international travel ban and asset freeze on the leaders of Zimbabwe does sound appropriate.

Leave a Reply